I went round the exhibitions at Venice with my dissertation topic of titles in mind, and was really interested by what I discovered about the different ways in which image and text are used in artworks. I tried to make a fe wnoted on each , which I will run through...
Shilpa Gupta used text a lot and in different ways - it was very much a part of the work, instead of just a supplement or caption. This is evident in how the text has been framed as if pictures themselves; I thought the frame was a curious tool, almost like a title in itself, saying that the words were the work, and elevating it with traditional gallery protocol. In the first image here, Guptaalso just captioned her image in pencil below in a much more informal way - I wondered what this gave the work that would be missing if it were written instead on a caption or label separate to the image. It is almost as if the work is part of a journal this way - it has been noted and dated in the moment, it belongs to that specific time with that handwriting. Printed text would be more of an afterthought, more premeditated.
Hans Haacke made these works of statistics and charts, combining text and imagery in a familiar way. There was a whole wall of this information, with a very large amount of text. Clearly, in this instance text is very much the work. I wanted to remember this and recognise that text exists in different contexts, not just as title or caption, or words within a painting, but as a function within everyday activities and processes. Therefore works using things like books, or found objects with text on or works such as this, where writing is a part of an established system, include text in a less emphatic manner; it is almost a constituent part of a bigger thing.
Olga Chernysheva's drawing caught my eye because of their odd-looking tacked-on captions. Although not a fan of the intentionally informal presentation of the text, I really relate to the tone and intrinsic relationship to the images. It is clear that they are very much reliant on each other - to say that her work is the drawing would be wrong, because the captions play such an important part in framing what the viewer sees in them. I absolutely love the sense of humor and irony in them, especially the wasp drawing. They remind me of the way I try to caption my Instagram posts; often I post pictures of really mundane things like mold but try to explain why I find it interesting - the same for my work i some instances, I always feel I need to tell people what it is that I want them to see. I'm considering mentioning these works in my dissertation as I think they're such a fascinating example of text and image being dependent on each other to comprise meaning.